• Français
    • English
  • Français 
    • Français
    • English
  • Login
View Document 
  •   Savoirs UdeS Home
  • Médecine et sciences de la santé
  • Publications et recherches – Médecine et sciences de la santé
  • Médecine et sciences de la santé – Articles de périodiques
  • View Document
  •   Savoirs UdeS Home
  • Médecine et sciences de la santé
  • Publications et recherches – Médecine et sciences de la santé
  • Médecine et sciences de la santé – Articles de périodiques
  • View Document
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of Savoirs UdeSDomains & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDirectorsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDirectors

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Can we quickly and thoroughly assess pain with the PACSLAC-II? : a convergent validity study in long-term care residents suffering from dementia.

Thumbnail
View/Open
Article de périodique (339.8Kb)
Publication date
2017
Author(s)
Ruest, Mélanie; Bourque, Monique; Laroche, Sarah; Harvey, Marie-Philippe; Martel, Marylie; Bergeron-Vézina, Kayla; Apinis, Catherine; Proulx, Dominique; Hadjistavropoulos, Thomas; Tousignant-Laflamme, Yannick; Léonard, Guillaume
Editor(s)
Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Sherbrooke. Centre de recherche sur le vieillissement
Subject
Pain
 
Long-term care
 
Nursing home
 
Elderly
 
Dementia
 
Alzheimer’s disease
Show full document record
Abstract
Abstract : A previous study found that the modified version of the Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors with Limited Ability to Communicate (PACSLAC-II) is a valid tool to assess pain in elderly individuals suffering from dementia and who are unable to communicate verbally. The primary objective of this study was to confirm the convergent validity of the PACSLAC-II using direct evaluation of long-term care residents in real-life situations, using two other well-validated pain assessment scales (i.e., PACSLAC and Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia [PAINAD]). A secondary objective was to document and compare the time required to complete and score each assessment scale. During two potentially painful procedures (i.e., transfer/mobilization), 46 long-term care residents (mean age = 83 ± 10 years) suffering from dementia were observed by three independent evaluators, each using one of the assessment scales (randomly assigned). Correlational analyses and analysis of variance were used to evaluate the association between each scale and to compare scoring time. The PACSLAC (r = 0.61) and the PAINAD (r = 0.65) were both moderately associated with the PACSLAC-II (all p values < .001). The PAINAD's average scoring time (63 ± 19 seconds) was lower than the PACSLAC-II's (96 ± 2 seconds), which was lower than the PACSLAC's (135 ± 53 seconds) (all p values < .001). These results suggest that the PACSLAC-II is a valid tool for assessing pain in individuals with dementia. The time required to complete and score the PACSLAC-II was reasonable, supporting its usefulness in clinical settings.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11143/11510
Collection
  • Médecine et sciences de la santé – Articles de périodiques [222]

DSpace software [version 5.4 XMLUI], copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
 

 


DSpace software [version 5.4 XMLUI], copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback